
Reading the fine print of Scope 3
Why the largest share of most companies' footprint sits outside their own walls — and where to begin when the data is thin.
Read articleInsights
Articles and research on the frameworks shaping sustainability practice — and the decisions they force.
Research publication · Planetary Plus Research & Intelligence
Our review of Principle 6 environmental disclosures across 60 listed Indian textile, apparel, footwear and fashion-retail companies.
The full research note: findings, charts, peer comparisons, self-check tools and methodology.
We reviewed the Principle 6 environmental disclosures in the latest Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reports (BRSRs) of 60 listed Indian textile, apparel, footwear and fashion-retail companies, mostly for FY2024-25. Reporting is maturing, and several companies now disclose renewable-energy targets and Scope 3 estimates. Our review also identified potential inconsistencies in units, reporting boundaries and year-on-year explanations that merit further checking.
Research note by Ritika Goenka, Founder & Principal Consultant, Planetary Plus
All figures describe the 60 companies in our sample. They are not estimates for the Indian textile industry as a whole.
report both Scope 1 and Scope 2 figures. 9 disclose any Scope 3 information; 5 give a full Scope 3 total.
of reported Scope 1 + 2 in fabric processing and denim is Scope 1 (on-site fuel), against 29% in spinning.
median renewable share of total energy among 33 manufacturers with comparable data. The top quarter is above 30%.
reports show at least one potential inconsistency in units, boundary or year-on-year explanation that merits checking.
Energy and emissions
Share of reported Scope 1 and Scope 2 within each subsector, FY2024-25. Only companies with usable figures for both scopes are included; the peer count is shown beside each bar.
Where Scope 1 dominates, as in wet processing, the main questions concern boiler fuel, steam efficiency and captive power. Where Scope 2 dominates, as in spinning and retail, they concern how electricity is sourced.
Renewable share also varies widely within each subsector. Business model alone does not explain the gap; procurement and site decisions appear to matter as much.
Water and disclosure
FY2024-25, by subsector, 49 companies reporting
Number of the 60 reports that include each item
Home textiles and spinning account for about 70% of the water withdrawal reported in our sample. 11 of the 60 reports do not give a usable water withdrawal figure.
Often where the energy table is already filled in.
kWh, litres or air-quality units where GJ or tCO₂e are expected.
Changes that may reflect boundary shifts, new capacity or data corrections.
For example Scope 2 against electricity use, or consumption against withdrawal.
Stores, leased sites or whole tables placed outside the BRSR.
Counts overlap; one report can show more than one issue. These are observations on reported information and may reflect typing or formatting errors rather than measurement problems.
Self-check
Eight questions drawn from the issues above. Your answers stay in your browser and generate a list of items to review. This is a reporting-readiness prompt only. It is not a compliance assessment, an assurance-readiness opinion or a performance rating.
Both measures are ratios, so they can be compared across companies of different size without revenue or production data. Bands show the middle 50% of comparable FY2024-25 reports and appear only where at least five exist. Figures you enter stay in your browser.
Compare your renewable share of total energy with the spread reported by peers in the same subsector for FY2024-25. Enter both figures in the same unit and for the same boundary. Bands are shown only where at least five comparable reports exist. Some reports count biomass fuel as renewable; check how your own figure is defined.
Middle 50% of 10 comparable reports: 7.4% to 30.6%. Enter your figures to place your company on the band.
Enter total energy consumed and of which renewable to see where you sit.
Scope 1 + Scope 2 emissions divided by total energy consumed, in tonnes CO₂e per terajoule (TJ). It shows how carbon-heavy your energy mix is: grid electricity and coal push it up; renewables and biomass bring it down. It is not an efficiency measure, because it says nothing about energy used per unit of output.
tCO₂e per TJ. Middle 50% of 6 comparable reports: 123 to 154. Enter your figures to place your company on the band.
Enter total energy consumed (gj) and scope 1 (tco₂e) and scope 2 (tco₂e) to see where you sit.
Subsectors
Process heat and captive power for polymerisation or pulp, plus purchased feedstock in Scope 3.
Do we know the carbon footprint of a kilogram of our fibre, and could we share it with a buyer?
Purchased electricity, which drives most reported emissions in this subsector.
What share of our electricity could move to open-access or captive renewable supply, and at what cost?
Coal or other fuels for boilers and captive power.
How much steam do we use per metre of fabric, and how does it compare across our own units?
Process heat for coating, extrusion and finishing.
Are energy and water reported per unit of product for our main export lines?
Large combined energy and water footprint from integrated wet processing.
Does our water balance reconcile at each site, and is it reported on BRSR definitions?
Most emissions sit upstream in fabric and yarn, outside Scope 1 and 2.
Which of our fabric suppliers can give us primary energy data for the products we buy?
Electricity in factories and warehouses, plus materials such as leather, rubber and EVA.
Have we screened our Scope 3 material categories, and documented what we excluded?
Store and warehouse electricity.
Does our boundary include leased and franchised stores, and is it stated in the report?
Reading the numbers
A blank or "not applicable" line means no impact.
Missing disclosure means missing information. A spinning mill that buys grid electricity has Scope 2 emissions whether or not the table is filled.
Lower absolute emissions mean the company became more efficient.
Absolute totals also move with output, product mix, boundary changes and plant closures. Efficiency needs an intensity measure with a stable denominator.
"Renewable share" is one standard number.
Renewable electricity share and renewable share of total energy are different measures. Biomass in boilers can raise the second without any change in power sourcing.
Practice examples
Selected because the practice is clearly disclosed in the company's FY2024-25 BRSR. These describe reporting practice, not a judgement on overall performance.
States a quantified, time-bound goal of 60% renewable share of total energy by FY2030, reports 52% for FY2024-25, and discloses a first Scope 3 estimate.
Renewable share of total energy rose from about 8% to about 31% year on year. Scope 3 covers seven named categories, up from five.
Lists the eight Scope 3 categories it covers and states that the figures are verified. Its 33% renewable share is mostly biomass for steam, which the report makes clear.
Buyers
Requests differ by buyer and market. Most of these are contractual or voluntary rather than legal requirements for the supplier.
| Topic | Typical question | Usually arises from |
|---|---|---|
| Primary energy data | Can you share site-level electricity and fuel use, with sources, for the units that make our products? | Buyer request |
| Product carbon footprint | What is the footprint per kg of yarn or fabric, or per garment, and which standard was used (e.g. ISO 14067)? | Buyer request Voluntary standard |
| Supplier traceability | Which mills, processors and job-workers are in this product's chain, and do you hold their energy and chemical data? | Buyer request |
| Chemicals and wastewater | Do your wet-processing units test wastewater and manage restricted substances, for example under ZDHC? | Voluntary programme often referenced in buyer contracts |
| Facility environmental assessment | Have your facilities completed an assessment such as Higg FEM, and was it verified? | Voluntary tool requested by some brands |
| Targets | Do you have a quantified emissions target with a base year, and is it validated (e.g. by SBTi)? | Voluntary |
| BRSR and value-chain data | As a supplier to a listed customer, can you provide the environmental indicators it needs for its own BRSR? | Regulatory for the listed customer; check current SEBI applicability |
Method
For readers exploring these questions within their own business, a company-specific peer note is available on request.
Contact Planetary PlusSpeak to our team
Tell us where your reporting sits today and we will show you what a focused review would cover.

Why the largest share of most companies' footprint sits outside their own walls — and where to begin when the data is thin.
Read article
A practical look at assurance, comparability and the disclosures that now carry real weight for listed entities.
Read article
How a credible baseline turns a net-zero ambition into a sequence of decisions a business can actually execute.
Read articleDiscuss your requirements
We work with organisations on measurement, reporting and readiness. Start with a conversation.